We are doing that work.
By-the-way, you might have noticed that I've already help to create a
reasonably effective body called the Boston Working Group. We managed to
cause ICANN to have a general membership and other fairly significant
changes that IANA was unwilling to consider. So I'm pretty familiar with
the ropes.
> >Those will develop and firm-up as we self-organize. Indeed the IDNO is
> >vastly further along in an electoral system than any other part of ICANN.
>
> Ahh, I see. You want to be allowed to drive the car before you do the work
> of learning how. (Or, you want to be paid, before you do your job, or...)
That same brush can be used on every other constituency, the DNSO as a
whole, every other SO, and ICANN itself.
It is silly to expect the IDNO to burst forth fully formed in all details.
It is very clear that a Jim Crowe standard has been established -- bodies
of individuals have to prove their worth in ICANN while commercial
elements are presumed to be authoritative, unbiased, and broadly based.
(For those outside the US, Jim Crowe is a term that applies to laws that
were enacted to enforce racial segregation but did so using
neutral-looking language.)
--karl--
-- This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz. For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/