[IDNO:233] Re: NSI's interests

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: William X. Walsh: "[IDNO:239] Re: NSI's interests"
• Previous message: Joop Teernstra: "[IDNO:232] Re: Working groups are forming"
• In reply to: Kent Crispin: "[vcerf@MCI.NET: ICANN Commentary (Mike Roberts, David Post)]"

>Well, in fact, that is precisely the point. Absent the motivation, there
>is no way of legitimately claiming that the group is, itself, particularly
>concerned about the activity. Absent that motivation, claims by others on
>behalf of that constituency represent parental condescension.
>

Dave,

If you don't support the goals of the IDNO, then you are free not to
participate in it.

Your comments here frankly amaze me in their context, and I really
don't want to consider what motivates them, as it would further lessen
my opinion of your participation in this entire process.

The simple fact is that NO constituency meets the "requirements" you
lay out in your diatribe.

The IDNO is the only one that even comes close.

--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934

The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.

-- 
This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send
a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz.
For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/






 Next message: William X. Walsh: "[IDNO:239] Re: NSI's interests"
 Previous message: Joop Teernstra: "[IDNO:232] Re: Working groups are forming"
 In reply to: Kent Crispin: "[vcerf@MCI.NET: ICANN Commentary (Mike Roberts, David Post)]"