Hello Don, Very happy to hear from you.
No, no need to be on our list. We will be busy with internal organisational
matters.
Can we consider Kevin as your spokesman?
>
>Joop - Forgive me for never finding the time to talk. I certainly
>didn't mean any discourtesy.
>
Accepted.
I can also understand that in Berlin you didn't really see the need.
>Be careful about paying too much attention to Michael Sondow and Jeff
>Williams. Even though I pay no attention to either, I am aware that
>their favorite pastime is picking on me and/or ISOC. Actually, I
>have gone out of my way in an attempt to help Michael, but he seems
>rather to be more than a little suspicious. sigh
>
Sometimes it is difficult not to pay attention, when personal attacks are
made. I don't know how much time you have to read all these lists, but the
archives speak. Like you, I'm only human.
But thank you for the advice. If anything, it might be possible to come to
a joint solution of both the non-comm and the IDNO constituencies.
Don't you agree that at this stage it's better up to the DNSO itself to
self-organize its missing constituent parts, than to accept an ICANN
division that is not cast in stone anyway?
>I can tell you this, I/we have some very altruistic principles, that
>are posted on our web, and I live up to them. I nor ISOC have any
>designs at all on ICANN, the DNSO, or the NCDNHC. We would dearly
>like to see a consensus develop.
>
Then we will get a consensus.
Lets start with an open line of communication.
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org
-- This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz. For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/