> On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 09:01:30AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > I would say the the sentence in question IS an ad hominem,
> in its purist
> > form, since it injects "the person" into the discussion, in
> this case the
> > person being Karl.
>
> Forgive me for going on about this...
No I will NOT!
Consensus is growing that your intent is to be disruptive. Further
demonstrations, in that vein, on your part, fuels the consensus opinion
against you. I have seen you do this on four previous lists. I do not
and will not forgive you for continuing on this list. Please continue, I
would like to see you finally treated for the disruptive influence that
you are.
You ask for forgiveness, yet in the very same message, repeat your
offense.
No I will NOT forgive you ... ever! There is no justification for what
you do, you are a waste of bandwidth, oxygen, and space.