> On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 11:34:25PM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > At 22:07 13/06/1999 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > >There is no information concerning what is meant by "civil
> > >discourse", nor is there any indication of where I might find out
> > >anything about it.
> > >
> > Among civilised people there is not much need to spell out what civil
> > discourse is. It gets noted when it is absent.
>
> I beg to differ. Standards of behavior vary widely across the
> civilized world.
Right. I've had enough. I joined the IDNO (and the list) to hear what was
going to be done about giving key stakeholders in the DNS (name holders
such as myself) a voice among everyone else who claims to have a stake.
However, it's been nothing but dribble and semantics, and my lurking has
come to the conclusion that you, Kent, seem hell bent on ranting on about
a whole lot of things that have very little to do with the IDNO and a lot
to do with beating your chest. So Kent, welcome to my procmail filter.
Someone bring us back to the ICANN bashing, at least _that_ was vaguely on
topic :)
.------.-----------------------------------------------------.
| (__) | David Zanetti <dave2@earthling.net> |
| ( oo | Unix Systems Administrator, Wellington City Council |
| /\_| | Moderator, nz.politics.announce |
`------'-----------------------------------------------------'