[IFWP] Re: [discuss] Re: [IDNO:321] a democracy can defend itself

Joop Teernstra (terastra@terabytz.co.nz)
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 23:34:25 +1200


At 22:07 13/06/1999 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:

>There is no information concerning what is meant by "civil
>discourse", nor is there any indication of where I might find out
>anything about it.
>
Among civilised people there is not much need to spell out what civil
discourse is. It gets noted when it is absent.
We owe you a debt of gratitude for forcing us early on to formalize list
rules.
They are now posted on the website. They will be repeated at regular
intervals on the list.

>> ISOC members may want to tell us how the ISOC list would deal with such
>> behaviour.
>>
>> For those who need to be reminded,
>
>Since I have never seen any of this before, I can hardly be reminded.
>
I did post a request/reminder not to cross-post on june 4. You may have
missed that. But you did not miss the request for a statement of position
for non-members.
Since you are now aware of the rules, why do you still violate them and
continue to crosspost without asking?
Do you think the dnso list appreciates it?

--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org