[IDNO:579] Re: membership rules, last call

Joop Teernstra (terastra@terabytz.co.nz)
Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:48:26 +1200


At 23:30 26/06/1999 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote:

>In any case, these are used merely for IP to name lookups and they aren't
>the kind of thing that I think we normally mean when we talk about Domain
>Names in the normal sense.
>
So you think our language is adequate after all? If not, feel free to add
something that doesn't sound too complicated.

>(By-the-way, it just struck me that in H323, which is the basis for IP
>telephony, one of the ways to represent a "phone number" is a person's
>e-mail address. Now, when we talk about domain names being really and
>actually used for telephone access, there is absolutely no doubt that the
>bulk of the people affected are individuals, not corporations.)
>
>
The individuals who are affected through their email adresses (on the
Domains of others) are the ones to get their representation in the At Large
membership structure, if ICANN can get that together.
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org

-- 
This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send
a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz.
For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/