RE: Some thoughts on recurrence intervals

David Yeamans, CST-7, 5-8832, dryeamans@lanl.gov (dryeamans@lanl.gov")
Wed, 01 Oct 1997 17:23:33 -0600


This novel demonstration of
>headward erosion remains intriguing. My hunch is that the rain came faster
>than it could filter through the increasingly dense, saturated snow the way
>a stream of water flows off rather than through an already saturated sponge
>or the way a thunderstorm races down the Little Colorado rather than
>soaking into the Colorado Plateau.

Water supply exceeds infiltration rate and there is Horton overland flow.
If water supply lasts long enough for substrate to saturate, driving the
infiltration rate to zero, there is overland flow amounting to the original
flow plus the amount originally deducted by infiltration rate. For the high
infiltration rate of snow, this is a whale of a lot of rain unless the
temperature gradient is such that, as with a back country ski, wet from the
sunny snow, that hits cold snow beneath, the water freezes into an
impermeable layer.

Good observations, Al. You are blessed to have seen it.

Dave

====================================================================
To subscribe, send email to majordomo@songbird.com, with "subscribe
gcboaters" as the only line in the message body. To unsubscribe send
"unsubscribe gcboaters". For further information send "info
gcboaters", or see http://www.songbird.com/gcboaters
====================================================================