>David,
> Interesting question. Certainly, all quartz is not alike. There are
>minor but measureable chemical differences which lead also to crystal
>structural differences from sample to sample. The difficulty is not in
>measuring the differences but in relating the differences to source, etc.
>What you propose may be possible.
and
>Hi,
>
>I'm not sure I understand a couple of aspects of your email...are you
>asking for collaborators or just information? How does the source of the
>quartz tell you it is lacustrine or fluvial? I would say yes, it is
>possible to fingerprint quartz from sufficiently different sources.
>Probably a combination of techniques would give the most unambiguous
>answers. Two methods that come to mind are oxygen isotopes and electron
>spin resonance. A lot of work would have to be done to characterize the
>potential source formations; furthermore, the quartz in each has to be of
>sufficiently different origin for this to work (eg. plutonic vs. volcanic
>vs. metamorphic) for the oxygen. Regarding ESR fingerprinting of quartz
>you should check out the paper by Toyoda and Goff (1996) in the 47th New
>Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, "Jemez Mountains Region."
>
So, fellow dilletantes, the stakes may have been raised.
====================================================================
To subscribe, send email to majordomo@songbird.com, with "subscribe
gcboaters" as the only line in the message body. To unsubscribe send
"unsubscribe gcboaters". For further information send "info
gcboaters", or see http://www.songbird.com/gcboaters
====================================================================