Re: Upadi and Corpece

From: Alejandro Pisanty, DGSCA y FQ, UNAM (apisan@servidor.unam.mx)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2000 - 07:35:55 PST


Dear Carlos,

long before Corpece and Upadi approached the NCDNHC we went through this
process for all the initial organizations, and it has gone on as new
applications have come in.

Your note indicates that Upadi will not find any more challenges and
further clearly shows your entitlement to represent them.

It equally well states in all clarity why Corpece does not fit the bill.
Please read the bylaws. They are very explicit in that even a non-profit
corporation, as long as its main thrust is commerce, belongs in a
different part of the DNSPO (I would venture, the Business Constituency),
with its vote. For the NCDNHC it should not vote, as it would unduly give
it two votes within the constituency structure.

Alejandro Pisanty

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty,
     Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
     (Director, Computing Academic Services)
     Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
     Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico City DF MEXICO

Tel. (+52-5) 622-8541, 622-8542; Fax 622-8540
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:20:38 PDT