It's a good thing if it moves the process along. Either the group is
open or closed to new members, so just sitting on membership
applications without acting isn't a good thing. I assume the
subcommittee wants to move things along.
Jamie
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Raul Echeberria wrote:
> At 16:17 15/04/00 +0900, Adam Peake wrote:
> >Is the proposal to have applications sent to a small committee rather than
> >to the list?
> >
>
> I believe that the proposal could be sent to the list but I think that it
> would be very helpful if a small commitee deals with them and advice the
> AdCom about possible conflicts or applications which are not in accordance
> with the NCC's charter.
>
> Is only a proposal. If most of us don't like it, that's ok.
>
>
>
>
> Raul Echeberria
> raul@inia.org.uy
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: love@cptech.org
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org
>
=============================================
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
P.O. Box 19367 | http://www.cptech.org
Washington, DC 20036 | love@cptech.org
Voice 202/387-8030 | Fax 202/234-5176
=============================================
--- You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Kent@SONGBIRD.COM To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:20:39 PDT