Hi Milton:
> I agree with Raul. We should weigh in on the famous marks proposal.
>
> The WG B proposal contains many absurd and overreaching features. "Sunrise +
> 20" is ridiculous even from the standpoint of trademark holders.
And...this sunrise period for trademarks would be free of charge?
Because, if not, would you imagine the earnings of registrars??
How many trademarks are in the world? multiply this for the cost of a domain
per year! And divide it between every existent registrar!!!
I am agree with you Milton. But, if this sunrise period
achieve to be aprooved, I hope that, at least, they limit the registrations to
those commercial gTLDs, and that commercial entities cannot touch the
non-commercial gTLDs in order to register neither in the sunrise period,
neither in the future!
Also I don't understand why such opportunity (for whom have money to invest
in this) for trademarks...why not also for the non-commercial sector? One
thing is protect a trademark, other thing is give them the power to dominate the
domain names world.
Best Regards
Vany
> --
> m i l t o n m u e l l e r // m u e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
> syracuse university http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raul Echeberria" <raul@inia.org.uy>
> To: <ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 11:51 AM
> Subject: Re: ISOC Chapters and NC membership
>
>
> > At 08:22 11/05/00 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 10:11:12AM -0400, James Love wrote:
> > >> They should just create a constituency for individuals, so people
> > >> don't have to try to cram into groups where they don't fit. Also, I
> > >> don't see why so many people who are represented in the ccTLD or other
> > >> groups insist on voting here too, given their largely commercial
> > >> interests in ICANN issues.
> > >
> > >ccTLDs are largely non-commercial.
> > >
> >
> > We are always discussing about the same points. Could we discuss about
> > famous marks, new gTLDs, etc.
> >
> > The comments period for the WG-B report has ended.
> >
> > There are a lot of work to get a good final result. Kathy has worked very
> > hard and i believe that she has done a very good job, but the theme is not
> > finished.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ===================================================================
> > III Taller sobre Tecnologias de Redes e Internet
> > para America Latina y el Caribe
> > WALC2000
> >
> > 10 al 15 de Julio de 2000
> > Ciudad de Mexico
> >
> > http://www.walc2000.unam.mx
> >
> > Nos vemos en Mexico.
> > ==================================================================
> >
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: mueller@IST.SYR.EDU
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org
> >
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: vany@SDNP.ORG.PA
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1727E@lyris.isoc.org
-- Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales IT Specialist Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213 Fax: (507) 230-3646 e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa http://www.sdnp.org.pa--- You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Kent@SONGBIRD.COM To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:20:39 PDT