----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Crispin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> It does not deal with the succession problem when the candidate does
> not have an alternate, and it does not deal with the problem when the
> NC rep and the alternate are both indisposed.
And it doesn't cure AIDs. Your point?
Certainly my proposal could be modified to *require* an alternate. I would
accept that as a friendly amendment if that's your intention.
I don't consider the second problem to be a serious one.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 13 2000 - 19:58:49 PDT