On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Dany Vandromme wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Adam Peake wrote:
> >> Shouldn't we be using the February 2000 version of the charter as the basis
> >> for amendments?
> > -
> > After I made changes to the initial draft, I would prefer you point out
> > the changes suggested by Raul if they are significant. I would not redo
> > the changes again, otherwise I will not get it done before next week.
> > Thanks
> > Dany
>
> Dany, there are *many* significant differences, starting with the
> title, and in my opinion we really cannot use the old charter as a
> base. In the interests of time, I have edited your changes into
> Raul's last posted version and posted it on the web site.
-
OK for me
-
>
> I did make a couple of small changes, and interspersed a couple of notes
> about things that need to be fixed, IMHO. In particular, I marked the
> new text about political parties, since that is a fairly substantial
> addition, and I thought it should be highlighted. I also introduced the
> abbreviation "AdCom", and used it in several places. I reworded the
> segue following the "running mates" proposal so that it just flows
> naturally into the following section, and marked it as an addition
> rather than as an alternate, since the "AdCom selects" proposal is
> not optional -- it is present in all versions.
>
-
thanks
-
> Kent
>
> --
> Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
Reseau National de Telecommunications
pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
| ENSAM
Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 22:39:57 PDT