Re: PAB Elections

From: Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Date: Mon Dec 01 1997 - 11:01:28 PST


Bob Helfant writes:
> I didn't suggest that we vote on everything. Here is the relevant line
> from my previous email "Note that I said all items that require approval,
> not all items."

I believe the intent of the objection mechanism was to help
distinguish those things the bulk of the PAB thinks of as "not
requiring approval" from those that do require approval.

.pm

>
> Bob Helfant
>
> At 01:08 PM 12/1/97 -0500, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> >I don't agree that we should vote on everything. It isn't rough consensus
> >-- which, if we don't like, we should lobby POC to change in the gTLD-MoU;
> >it is very slow, and it requires the kind of time on the list that many PAB
> >members don't have (you, for instance).
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:14 PST