At 12:20 PM 12/3/97 +0100, you wrote:
>>>>
PAB
The discussion has now enlarged...
Questions:
1) Should 1 letter characters be allowed as SLDs?
<<<<
My feeling is that we should only consider technical reasons for
disallowing 1 letter SLDs. The fact that they will be in demand isn't
enough to differentiate them from other in-demand domains (i.e.,
software.store/shop).
>>>>
2) Should two letter country codes be allowed as SLD ? Should the country
have priority in an ACP ?
<<<<
Two letter SLDs should be allowed. I've used short domain names for two
companies in the past and people like them, particularly if the full
company name is not available.
I could see having restrictions on country codes if there was some evidence
that the current policy of allowing them was causing confusion. We don't
have any evidence that it is, though, so at this point giving a country
priority is unwarranted.
And third and higher level domains can have country codes right now, and
there's no confusion. There's no way we can control that, even if we tried.
>>>>
3) Should generics be allowed ? Should CORE manage Third level domains
under the most popular SLDs ?
I don't think we should put any constraints at all on SLD names. CORE
should stick to SLDs. We can always add more gTLDs if needed.
-- Steve Peterson +1 612 386 3986 Principal Consultant FAX +1 415 429-2084 Virtation Technologies, Inc. http://virtation.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:14 PST