Re: PAB Proposal for email

From: Bernhard Stockman (bernhard@telia.net)
Date: Sat Dec 06 1997 - 03:51:50 PST


> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 09:40:10 -0500
> To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
> From: "Robert J. DuWors" <rjd@csgroup.com>
> Subject: Re: PAB Proposal for email
> Cc: pab@gtld-mou.org

> Furthermore, an independent voting mechanism separate from discussion is
> desirable, irrespective of the policy of when to use it, to keep noise out
> of the actual discussion [aka debate in some circles].

This means not only a formal announcement-list but also a formal
response-to-voting etc list. Might not be the same.
A voting process would then, assuming a separate pab-vote mailing
list include in each voting event an explicit announcement giving the
necessary background information for the vote to make it possibel for
the non-pab-list subscribers to come to a sound conclusion before
giveing thier votes.

Regards,

  Bernhard.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:15 PST