Kent wrote
>> As I understand the current rules, where PAB membership is defined to
>> be an entity that has signed the MoU, and not the particular
>> individual behind the associated email address, you should be able to
>> vote as the PAB representative in each case.
Amadeu wrote
>I have not. As a matter of fact I just thought that this was a good way to
>start again the discussin of what "PAB membership" exactly means, and how
to
>handle conflicts.
I dont see PAB as having a membership. For me membership requires the
existence
of an organisation. PAB is not an organisation as it stands.
It is a group of participants appointed by gTLD-MoU signatories.
The MoU says the PAB exists to provide policy advice to POC.
In summary, the PAB in its present form is a supplier of services (policy
advice) to POC.
I suspect their needs to be some benefit to PABer's / gTLD-MoU signatories
to increase
participation.
Regards,
Peter Mott
Chief Enthusiast
2Day Internet Ltd
-/-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:16 PST