PAB policy voting: Arts

From: William Allen Simpson (wsimpson@greendragon.com)
Date: Fri Feb 27 1998 - 17:20:10 PST


Based on the public and private comments, here is the current edition of
the proposed Arts Charter. We have not received any official request
for some other TLD from CORE, so let's go ahead with this one, and deal
with the rest as they are requested. Oh esteemed Chair, do we need a
formal vote?

                            Arts Domain Charter

   A. Purpose

      1. This Top-Level Domain is intended to support entities that are
         involved in the practice, promotion, study or support of
         artistic endeavor.

      2. The same or similar name shall not be registered by the same
         organization in any other zone of the DNS (such as under a
         country TLD), unless an exception for good cause is granted
         under the registration appeal process (described below).

      3. The registration of a name or combination of names does not
         convey any TradeMark or ServiceMark status.

      4. The designated Arts registry management shall require that
         these same terms be carried forward by its registrants.

   B. Registration Process

      1. Registration of Second-Level Domains is open to all qualifying
         applicants on a non-discriminatory, fair-use, first-come,
         first-served basis, in compliance with the most recent revision
         of the Generic Top Level Domain Memorandum of Understanding
         (gTLD-MoU).

      2. Each qualifying Second-Level Domain must have (or share) 2 or
         more topologically dispersed secondary zone servers, in
         addition to the primary master.

      3. In any dispute as to the registration of a particular name, the
         registrar shall have no role or responsibility, other than to
         provide the contact information for all parties, and abide by
         the results of the appeals process. Appeals are taken by
         following the current process designated by the gTLD-MoU -- the
         Administrative Domain Name Challenge Panels.

      4. Whenever it is determined, on its own initiative or acting in
         response to a petition from any person, that an error in
         Second-Level Domain registration has occurred -- including (but
         not limited to) ineligibility, change in qualification status,
         or failure of the SOA contact to respond promptly to queries --
         the designated registry manager shall revoke or transfer the
         registration:

         a) no sooner than 21 days after sending notification to the SOA
            specified contact;

         b) with appeal of administrative and factual issues to the
            gTLD-MoU established Council of Registrars (CORE);

         c) and final appeal of process issues to the gTLD-MoU
            established Policy Oversight Committee (POC).

   C. Registry Operation

      1. The repository for the primary master zone server (the
         registry) shall be designated by the Council of Registrars
         (CORE), in compliance with the most recent revision of their
         Memorandum of Understanding (CORE-MoU), and with the
         concurrance of the Policy Oversight Committee (POC).

      2. The registry must have (or share) 5 or more topologically
         dispersed secondary zone servers, in addition to the primary
         master.

      3. The registry may seek reimbursement for each registration on an
         annualized non-profit cost-recovery basis, and in compliance
         with the CORE-MoU.

      4. Whenever it is determined, on its own initiative or acting in
         response to a petition from any person, that a registry has
         failed to conform to any registry requirements or that another
         registry could provide a significantly better combination of
         costs and services, the Council of Registrars (CORE) may
         designate a change to another registry:

         a) no sooner than 49 days after sending notification to the SOA
            specified contact;

         b) with appeal of administrative and factual issues to the
            Policy Oversight Committee (POC);

         c) and final appeal of process issues to the authority
            designated by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) --
            currently the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) --
            or its successor.

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:26 PST