On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 09:37:17PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Jeff;
>
> > The current IANA is really insignificant with respect to the New Corporation
> > that is to be formulated, regardless of what it may be called.
>
> Could you please explain why you take it granted that some new
> organization is necessary in addition to the existing
> PAB/POC/CORE/ISOC/IANA/IAB?
>
> FYI, "because the WP says so" is not an acceptable answer.
>
> Masataka Ohta
"Because the organization paying for the tune to be called" is an acceptable
answer, whether you approve of it or not.
(That happens to be the US Government, natch).
-- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:31 PST