it seems to me that the PAB's views are important input.
Also the ISPs.
Vint Cerf
At 08:14 AM 7/4/98 -0700, Rick H. Wesson wrote:
>
>Kent,
>
>While i think that the PAB voice would be good, i would rather see
>some imput from POC, CORE, IAB, IESG, ISOC on these matters, that are
>the ones that have supported the MoU the most, alas they seem
>very quiet in the IFWP, i guess they are waiting for the ISOC-98.
>
>Still i would like to see what the I* has to say. As for the PAB,
>what can we "do?"
>
>-rick
>
>On Sat, 4 Jul 1998, Kent Crispin wrote:
>
>> I honestly have no particular ax to grind in this matter -- I will,
>> as always, express my personal opinions in various places. But I
>> think the collective voice of those who have supported the MoU should
>> have an opportunity to be heard, if it wishes to speak.
>>
>> Comments, please.
>>
>> --
>> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited",
>
>
>
=================================================================
If you are using any email address other than vcerf@mci.net,
please change your address book to use that address exclusively.
See you at INET'98, Geneva 21-24,July 98 http://www.isoc.org/inet98/
http://www.mci.com/aboutyou/interests/technology/ontech/cerf.shtml
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:32 PST