On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> The MoU itself makes no such representation. In any case, this is not
> a matter for the entire PAB. I would suggest you take it to the
> officers.
Indeed, the MoU takes no representation, nor do any of the associated
documents, nor does PAB. In fact, as we all know, PAB is explicitly
a publically readable forum. Further, the NTIA proceedings were
required by the ex parte rules to be explicitly public.
However, as a courtesy to Mr Dellheim I have edited out his personal
email address from all PAB correspondence to date. I have informed
him that I will not do this for any future correspondence -- the PAB
list is a publically readable list, and all submissions to it are
explicitly to be a part of the public record.
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:33 PST