At 00:44 23/01/98 -0800, you wrote:

>Regarding David Maher's proposal:


>

>Hopefully the following proposition will spark some discussion:

>

>I propose that we accept David's proposal in spirit, with perhaps 

>some modification to the details of the voting scheme, with this one 

>addition/clarification:  That nominees, like POC members from the other 

>organizations, not necessarily be from organizations that have signed 

>the MoU


Then, The Nominees are:

<paraindent><param>out</param>POC members who signeg the MoU;

</paraindent>POC members who not signed the Mou.


I think, this is good.


>Note that the way David's proposal reads, each PAB member can nominate

>someone.  So this last action is actually something that PAB members

>can do individually -- I could, for example, post to the gtld-discuss

>list that I am interested in nominating an individual to serve on the

>POC as a consumer representative, and that I am soliciting likely

>candidates.  However, I think there is some considerable value to a

>*policy* of soliciting nominees externally -- I think it would be a 

>powerful inducement for signing the MoU.

>

>Comments, please.


It is important to know about relationship between MoU and IANA, then who
the  nominees are,

should be pretty defined the powerful *policy* to sign the MoU. 




Best Regards,

Teddy A. Purwadi

APJII, Secretary General

P:+62-21 526 8777

F:+62-21 526 8789

E:sekjen@apjii.or.id

http://www.apjii.or.id