Antony,
With all respect, the last thing that I want to do is to interfere for in a call for consensus, whoever informal, but I think that this one does not reflect the proposal that has been presented. It represents your own points of view in some places, and, as you are the Chairman and you are putting forward a POC proposal, I think that it is unacceptable.
Again, with all respect, your job as Chairman is not to ask the questions that *you* think PAB should answer, but to try to reflect the proposal that has been presented to PAB and offer choices.
Antony,
With all respect, the last thing that I want to do is to interfere for in a call for consensus, whoever informal, but I think that this one does not reflect the proposal that has been presented. It represents your own points of view in some places, and, as you are the Chairman and you are putting forward a POC proposal, I think that it is unacceptable.
Please send another questionaire that sticks to the terms of the proposal.
Getting into details:
I find your first two questions extremelly biased and out of context.
>1. Should the PAB and POC become one organization, with the POC as the Executive Committee of PAB?
>[ ] Yes=A0 [ ] No
>Comments:
The POC proposal does not at all imply this.
It says that a number of POC members may be elected by PAB (as the chosen constituency), not that those elected should run PAB. This would be one more right/duty of PAB. PAB electing POC members does not release PAB from being an advisory body with its own separate officials.
>2. If the PAB and POC are separate bodies, should the PAB reps on POC have a duty to report to PAB on POC proceedings, formal or informal, unless specifically requested not to do so by POC?
>[ ] Yes=A0 [ ] No
>Comments:
You are not helping the procedure at all by bringing here the subject to your own private opinions and discussion. Please stick to the proposal and/or alternatives. This subject will be discussed when the Charter is brought up.
>4. If the POC is expanded, should the PAB elect 9 of its 18 voting members?
>[ ] Yes=A0 [ ] No
>Comments:
Nothing that may be answered here has any meaning. By NO somebody may mean *too many*, somebody may mean *not enough*
>
>5. If the PAB does elect POC members, should they be divided as follows?
>Should they be divided up at all?=A0
This question does not make sense here. The reason to increase POC is to have more groups represented, not to have more people.
> Consider if you think these are the
>groups that should have representation reserved to them, or if the
>definitions are too rigid, or too vague.=A0 Consider if you think that they
>might have too much or too little voting strength.=A0 Consider if you think
>that geographical distribution is a good thing.
That is only the first question. The next question would be to propose other ways of getting geographical distribution without having specific seats.
>
>6.=A0 Should the POC continue to have the following members appointed to it
>by the following organizations?
> b. Two persons appointed by IANA
>=A0 [ ] Too many=A0 [ ] Too few
>=A0 Comments:=A0=A0
What if somebody thinks that the number is just right ? There is an option missing.
>Thank you.=A0 Please note again that these are the questions *I* think should
>be answered by the PAB.=A0 If you have additional comments, or think that
>these questions are wrong-headed or miss the point, please say that too.
>The point is to say what you think.
Again, with all respect, your job as Chairman is not to ask the questions that *you* think PAB should answer, but to try to reflect the proposal that has been presented to PAB and offer choices.
If you include your own opinions in the questions, then the answers are useless to anybody.
Please send another questionaire.
Javier
Javier SOLA=A0 -=A0=A0 jsola@aui.es
Director=A0=A0 -=A0 Asociacion de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.aui.es>
Observer - Policy Oversight Committee of the gTLD-MoU <http://www.gtld-mou.org>
Tel:=A0 902-21.03.23=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0 Fax: 91-344.14.25
Av. Alberto Alcocer, 46 Dup. 5=BA C - 28016 Madrid
=A0=A0=A0 Comte d'Urgell, 143 1=BA 1=AA - 08036 Barcelona