Re: PAB POC Observer nominations
Kent Crispin (kent@songbird.com)
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 12:40:39 -0800
On Wed, Dec 10, 1997 at 07:14:52AM +0100, Javier SOLA wrote:
> At 20:21 9/12/97 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> >Amadeu,
> >
> >Nominations seem to be open and we have discussed that any PAB officer
> >could be a POC observer. i will second your motion and put both
> >on for POC observers.
>
> Rick,
>
> Please do not confuse the voting anymore. It is the secretary who decides
> who has qualified (by accepting the nomination) or not to be in the ballot.
> Kent has accepted, but Dan has declined. In case of any doubt, please check
> with Robert Connelly.
For the record, I appreciate the compliment implied in Amadeu's
nomination and Rick's second, and I am also perfectly willing to let
Bob decide however he thinks best -- I won't be offended if he
disallows it. I don't want to perpetuate any controversy about the
duration of the nomination period, or the election, and I see no value
in a "constitutional crisis" over the issue.
Onward!
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html