Per Rick's posting, below, I take pleasure in confirming that the list of
officers and POC Members from PAB are as stated in my prior posting.
You have important issues before you. My this New Year bring you the wisdom=
to
deal with them creatively. :-)
Personal regards,
BobC
At 03:16 PM 1/1/98 -0800, Rick H. Wesson wrote:
>
>Yes, congrads to everyone.
>
>sorry i was away and couldn't get access to the net.
>
>On Thu, 25 Dec 1997, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>
>> I was surprised to see the results so soon.=A0 I saw one note from Rick
>> saying he's be away till the 29th.=A0 I assume he felt that the margins=
were
>> high enough that there could be no chance of error.
>
>I had stated that I would post the results by the 23rd, I had made a
>mistake in setting notification time in the ballot to the 25th.
>=20
>> Michael Nagel made the comment that the results should not be available
>> till the 25th.=A0 According to Dan's system, the elections should not=
have
>> been closed out till 23:59 GMT of the 25th.=A0 Michael is certainly=
correct
>> and I shall therefore not make an "official announcement" until Rick
>> returns and verifies that no change resulted from last minute votes.
>
>no votes were recieved after the 22nt.
>
>> That said, I am satisfied that Rick's acts were based upon good logic.=A0=
I
>> do not expect any change in the results after the 25th.=A0 Therefore, I=
am
>> sure that we have an excellent corps of new officers.=A0 You new officers=
may
>> be assured of my full support.
>
>
>I hope that everyone is satisfied with the voting even though i experenced
>a 'learning curve,' dan's software is an excellent start at this. our
>bigest challenge is keeping our data current. i will prepair a report
>on voting and the problems and issues that should be taken care of before
>we need to vote on something else.
>
>happy new year and congrads to all that participated ;-)
>
>-rick
> =20