At 01:57 AM 1/10/98 +0100, Sascha Ignjatovic wrote:
>mr.maher could you please again send us the particular part of the
>proposal for enlargement the poc itsself hase forwarded to pab-since we
>have not a archive and a pab working home page :-)
>
>if you or the poc hase changed your vuews/proposal already a bit
>
>thank you
>sascha
>ps.sory but the list was "noisy" at this time you have made a request
> for comments and contribution from pab so it was not "undersatandable"
> very well
>
> but now the situation is more apropriate and we have organized our
> self a little more and are "listening" with greater atention :-)
>
> and hopefuly ablle to replay and contribute in a better way
>
> if i have understand it a little than the poc-enlargement proposal
> puts a "presure and waight" on pab without giving ideas how pab
> should hold this waight without apropirate structure :-)
>
> so i see hier the interdependenc of poc and pab and hope for
> a good cooperation when you want a advice from us than we also
> request your ideas/advice how to organise pab that it may become
> able to acomplish the task poc proposal puts on it :-)
>
> in my poor english policy advisory body may mean body wich could be
> advised as well :-)
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>