>Regarding David Maher's proposal:
>
>Hopefully the following proposition will spark some discussion:
>
>I propose that we accept David's proposal in spirit, with perhaps
>some modification to the details of the voting scheme, with this one
>addition/clarification: That nominees, like POC members from the other
>organizations, not necessarily be from organizations that have signed
>the MoU
Then, The Nominees are:
<paraindent><param>out</param>POC members who signeg the MoU;
</paraindent>POC members who not signed the Mou.
I think, this is good.
>Note that the way David's proposal reads, each PAB member can nominate
>someone. So this last action is actually something that PAB members
>can do individually -- I could, for example, post to the gtld-discuss
>list that I am interested in nominating an individual to serve on the
>POC as a consumer representative, and that I am soliciting likely
>candidates. However, I think there is some considerable value to a
>*policy* of soliciting nominees externally -- I think it would be a
>powerful inducement for signing the MoU.
>
>Comments, please.
It is important to know about relationship between MoU and IANA, then who
the nominees are,
should be pretty defined the powerful *policy* to sign the MoU.
Best Regards,
Teddy A. Purwadi
APJII, Secretary General
P:+62-21 526 8777
F:+62-21 526 8789
E:sekjen@apjii.or.id