I would like to see the PAB accept the POC proposal with
the changes you suggested below.
-rick
On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Kent Crispin wrote:
> Regarding David Maher's proposal:
> I propose that we accept David's proposal in spirit, with perhaps
> some modification to the details of the voting scheme, with this one
> addition/clarification: That nominees, like POC members from the other
> organizations, not necessarily be from organizations that have signed
> the MoU, and that further, PAB will solicit proposals for qualified
> nominees through the gtld-discuss list and perhaps other fora.
>
> Note that the way David's proposal reads, each PAB member can nominate
> someone. So this last action is actually something that PAB members
> can do individually -- I could, for example, post to the gtld-discuss
> list that I am interested in nominating an individual to serve on the
> POC as a consumer representative, and that I am soliciting likely
> candidates. However, I think there is some considerable value to a
> *policy* of soliciting nominees externally -- I think it would be a
> powerful inducement for signing the MoU.
>
> Comments, please.
>