PAB pab-competence

Sascha Ignjatovic (sascha@isoc.vienna.org)
Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:10:21 +0100 (MET)


hi pab

it would be great if we can manage also to become a "partner" in the
recent developments at least to organize our "information retrieval" in
such way that at least we have the minimum of information
"whats going on and could hapen in the future"

the information the pab-as advisory body :-) gets from the recent
developments are "really basic" not to say "primitive"

we haved no direct source of information what is going there in
washington and relay on the source of news-agencys and more or less
competent "report" from people who was there and was kind inaf to
inform us or to "disinform" us

so hier i like to thank to mr.patrik who hase offer us his perpective
and also mr.antony for his perspective wich was not to elaborate :-(

so the pab need its own "direct information processing system" :-)
where we can also have our own way and access to up to date and state of
the art inforamtion and hapenings

it is really funny that the pab gtld-discuss list was the first source for
information also for the "real pab"

NOT one -except mr.patrik from the official poc or core hase spend ONE
word to pab about whats going on or what should go on !!

if the gtld process and pab still exists :-) after "the report"
we should definitely organize our self as "coplayer" and build up our
own resources to acomplish our work - wich was give to us by the MOU

i hope i am with this in the line of our chairman mr.crispin who was/is
the proponent for a stronger pab-we see that we are not taken or
considered seriously by the other parts of the gtld process becouse we
have nothing serious to offer

so we should change this and become a good partner and contribute also
some useful work-even in this "dificult" time of "transition" to
the next level in development for the internet dns

thank you very much for atention
and hope to be in "your line" with this

thanks
sascha