Re: PAB Future

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Wed, 04 Feb 1998 19:26:43 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kent Crispin: "Re: PAB be constructive."
Previous message: K S LIM: "Re: Motion to accept Re: PAB charter"
Maybe in reply to: Ron Fitzherbert: "PAB Future"
Next in thread: Kent Crispin: "Re: PAB be constructive."

Ron Fitzherbert writes:
> The ONLY thing providing "bite" to the green-paper is the fact that the
> USG directly (or indirectly) control 1/2 the root-servers (including "A",
> though I would suspect that NSI feels that THEY control "A").

I believe that Jon should explain to all the root server operators
that as of a particular date they should start loading the database
from him. I suspect that reasonable mechanisms can be found to deal
with any that refuse, including NSI.

Perry

Next message: Kent Crispin: "Re: PAB be constructive."
Previous message: K S LIM: "Re: Motion to accept Re: PAB charter"
Maybe in reply to: Ron Fitzherbert: "PAB Future"
Next in thread: Kent Crispin: "Re: PAB be constructive."