Re: PAB Future

K S LIM (ks_lim@logchina.com.sg)
Thu, 05 Feb 1998 17:24:20 +0930

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Dixon: "Re: PAB be constructive."
Previous message: K S LIM: "Re: PAB Future"
Maybe in reply to: Ron Fitzherbert: "PAB Future"

Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> Ron Fitzherbert writes:
> > The ONLY thing providing "bite" to the green-paper is the fact that the
> > USG directly (or indirectly) control 1/2 the root-servers (including "A",
> > though I would suspect that NSI feels that THEY control "A").
>
> I believe that Jon should explain to all the root server operators
> that as of a particular date they should start loading the database
> from him. I suspect that reasonable mechanisms can be found to deal
> with any that refuse, including NSI.
>
> Perry
Dear Perry
Would Jon agree to do that? Has any one asked him? It will help
positively if he can identify his position via-a-vis the GP.
Best regards.

-- 
KS LIM
LOGIC GROUP OF COMPANIES
545 ORCHARD ROAD, #08-04/05
SINGAPORE 238882
TEL:65-7330553,FAX:65-7333068
E-MAIL: ks_lim@logchina.com.sg
        kslim@singnet.com.sg

Next message: Jim Dixon: "Re: PAB be constructive."
Previous message: K S LIM: "Re: PAB Future"
Maybe in reply to: Ron Fitzherbert: "PAB Future"