Re: Motion to accept Re: PAB charter

Jim Dixon (jdd@vbc.net)
Thu, 5 Feb 1998 18:03:49 +0000 (GMT)


On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Ron Fitzherbert wrote:

> Fine, I'll "support" this request AS LONG AS the ISOC also gets as many
> votes as the members it represents, which depending on your view of the
> world is 5,000 or 40,000,000 -- then of course every other representative
> organization should get the same.

Each ISOC chapter? Sure. Each person supposedly represented by
ISOC? Don't be silly.

> If EuroISPA really wants to have the ability to "control" then they need
> to sign 500 copies of the MOU and appoint 500 DIFFERENT people -- under
> current "rules" that would be fine and they can vote as a "block" -- BUT,
> if that happens I'd give POC/CORE about 5 minutes to modify things to
> eliminate the PAB.

The POC has already indicated that (a) it would like EuroISPA's
involvement and (b) if the PAB clearly agrees on major changes,
those major changes will be made.

CORE has no relevance to these proceedings.

> This is not about voting power it is about getting the most PEOPLE
> together to decide on things, NOT the most organizations.

As far as I am concerned, this is all about widening support for
the gTLD MOU. If that support doesn't increase by a large amount
and quickly, the gTLD MOU will go down the tubes very soon.

--
Jim Dixon                  VBCnet GB Ltd           http://www.vbc.net
tel +44 117 929 1316                             fax +44 117 927 2015