Actually, that is not what you proposed.
Your original proposal was that a blanket organization such as
EuroISPA be able to sign the MoU, and receive votes commensurate with
the entities it represented. One signature, many votes. Presumably
after a short time you realized the absurdity of such a position
(which *is* consistent with EuroISPA signing and getting 500 votes --
it all depends on what definition you use for "represent"), and
changed it to the above.
>From your original email to POC and EuroISPA, forwarded to me by POC:
>We would prefer that our member associations be allowed to be able to sign
>on behalf of their members, possibly with a list of those members who
>choose not to sign. This would allow ISPA UK, for example, to sign on
>behalf of its 83 or so members and appoint one spokesman who would be
>explicitly recognised as the representative of that many signatories.
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html