Jim, overall I think it is excellent.
The description of the proposal for IANA may be a little too detailed,
though -- it might be better to concentrate more on the reasons for
the structure, rather than the details of the structure.
Also, I understand that the document isn't complete, but remember
that Magaziner, and potentially congressional staffers who will be
reading the document, won't necessarily know what EuroISPA is. A
little puffery on that is in order, I think.
Finally, Magaziner plays hardball. The document will, I hope, show
a little more fangs and claws when it is done.
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html