> As to its oversight being public/private I think that we are missing an
> important point: POC is basically an "independent" oversight body (or
> "external" if you prefer)
??
> I would
> > describe it as "open, private-sector, oversight", or even as
> > "open, balanced-interest, private-sector...". Then you are
> > likely to have to defend the truth of "open" and "balanced"
> > against people who will disagree, but you will at least be
> > having the discussion you intend to have.
>
> I'd like the concept of "independnet" expclicitly added to your definition.
POC is not "independent"
poc is "dependent" on founding organisations isoc and iana at least in a
moral way but i would see the intelectual and also "cyber-political"
dependence too
> Amadeu
thanks
sascha
ps.in this examniation i dont incorperate the aspect of
"external relation/problematik" with the "rest of the world/governments"
just the "internal" dependence