Re: PAB Re: Consensus

Sascha Ignjatovic (
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 05:56:19 +0200 (MET DST)

> > > 2. As a whole, the IFWP participants should act as the principle
> > > incorporators of the new organization. In other words, we can be
> > > considered to be *the* stakeholders. [Emphasis added]

they are not autorised to represent anybody mostly of the time the
organisations they claim to represent dont know anything about this/them
and therefor can not be the "principle incorporators" of anything..!

it is not a internet stakeholder community efort but rather a effort of a
vuew persons companys and organisations to claim they represent the WHOLLE
internet stakeholder community and therefor they should be the PRINCIPLE

if ANY they may represent a VERY SMALL portion of the internet stakeholder

we should not use this ugly name "international forum on white paper"
to describe the internet community efforts or anything else
..or even uglyer GIAW (Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop)

this names are oversized missleading and nonsaying as all names chosen by
the same people who was oponents to the gtld-mou and tryied to build
"something better" by their own

"international forum on white paper".. on what?

white toalet paper ?
white school paper ?
white paper with nothing on it ?

and for that you need a "international forum" ?

GIAW (Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop) ?

this names says what it intends to be
vuew companys claims to be the global "incorporation alliance workshop"..?

they are so ugly who is thinking them out anyway ?

he musst have really a bad taste or no humor at all

becouse those names are bad jokes :-(

not with me !

i dont accept the "leadership" of this people and they are not the
legitime "global internet stakeholder efforts organisers"

never was and never be

please IANA beware us of such "incorporating" and "leadership" eforts

thank you
ps.very personal