Re: DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1
Kent Crispin (kent@songbird.com)
Tue, 17 Nov 1998 05:15:30 -0800
On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 03:01:09PM -0500, cgomes@internic.net wrote:
> Kent,
>
> I probably should have worded my questions more carefully.
> I intended them to generate discussion, not to criticize
> what was done. Should SOs fund ICANN? I think not. Should
> SOs be self-funded? I think so. Should registries fund
> ICANN? I think so.
>
> What are your thoughts on these questions?
I am in total agreement with you, and indeed, I think that is the
common understanding at this point. In the paper we were bending
over backwards to avoid any assumptions about such things, though.
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html