Archive of discuss@dnso.org by subject
Starting: Mon 26 Oct 1998 - 02:39:27 PST
Ending: Wed 20 Jan 1999 - 11:22:14 PST
Messages: 546
- "constitutional protections"
- "constitutional protections")
- (Nearly) everything is feasible
- (Nearly) everything is feasible (was: somehting else.....)
- .com versus .org
- 12 Commandments of flaming
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?IM=D1ORTANT?=: Teleconf on Saturday 23
- [dnsproc-en] .com versus .org
- [Fwd: [Fwd: merge5.txt]]
- [Fwd: merge5.txt]
- [iana@ISI.EDU: SO note]
- [ifwp] cTLD name considered harmful
- [ifwp] How not to define membership classes
- [ifwp] Incorporating DNSO?
- [ifwp] RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List
- [ifwp] RE: time
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protection?
- [ifwp] Ripple
- [ifwp] what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ...
- [kent@songbird.com: draft application]
- A fresh approach to defining the DNSO
- A modest proposal - compare the proposals
- Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List
- AIP DNSO Proposal
- Amadeu's back
- Amendments to dnso.org and dnso.net bylaws
- Announcement
- Another Internet Bubble Pops: Tuvalu's .TV Deal
- AW: Our draft
- CENTR comment on DNSO process
- Change to Proposal for a DNSO Membership Committee
- Comment period closes at 4pm EST
- Comment-Draft
- Commentary on ICC submission
- Comments on draft 7
- Comments on Draft 7)
- Comments on ICC proposed changes
- Comments received, being published
- Comments to the DNSO proposals
- Constituencies
- Definition (was Constituencies)
- Disclosure - Was: RE: DNSO worries
- DNSO / Fluid Constituencies
- DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1
- DNSO / Individual v. Corporate Voting
- DNSO APPLICATION TIMETABLE
- DNSO Dilemma
- DNSO documents
- DNSO draft proposals compared
- DNSO Important update: The "Merged" Draft
- DNSO Mty meeting: Holidex System reservations
- DNSO website update: New Draft & More
- DNSO website updated (more comments)
- DNSO website updates
- DNSO worries
- DNSO.ORG application, an analysis
- DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time)
- dnso.org Transition Team Teleconf, Jan 15 99
- DNSO.ORG transition team]
- Docket No. 980212036-8172-03: U.S. Gov't Position on ccTLDs and national govern
- draft of 1/19
- Esperanto
- Exclusion of the users: the ICC document
- Fees, expenses and voting on fees
- Forwarded mail....
- Free Tip
- FW: [ifwp] Letter of Invitation
- FW: Comments recieved being published
- FW: IMPORTANT: Teleconf on Saturday 23
- FW: NSI's DNSO Position
- Fw: SO structure - private
- FW: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; why the NI
- Fwd: The ORSC Delta
- Good news
- Good news]
- Hotel rates
- How do we want DNSO to be?
- How not to define membership classes
- ICANN - Membership Advisory Committee
- ICANN - public sector user stakeholders.
- ICANN Meeting schedule - please announce as in advance as
- ICANN Meeting schedule - please announce as in advance as possible
- icc comments in text
- icc comments on dnso draft
- icc general principles for a dnso
- ifwp list
- Important Report
- Incorporating DNSO?
- Incorporation or not?
- info on SGML editor
- Int'l DN/TM dispute policies
- INTA Application
- Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
- Introduction
- Invitation
- Jan. 23 Berkman Ctr workshop on ICANN membership issues
- January DNSO meeting for the trademark interests
- Jumping into bed
- Just a planning session
- Kent Crispin's Forward of "News from the ORSC"
- Mailing lists (last try)
- meeting notes...
- Merge draft
- merge5.txt
- Merry Christmas....
- Monterrey Report
- Monterrey Report]
- Monterrey, Mexico meeting
- My app declined
- New application draft on the web
- New York Times article on ccTLDs/IATLD
- News from the ORSC
- NSI's DNSO Position
- Objections to a flat structure
- online processes for the dnso
- open Washington meeting?
- Our draft
- participants@dnso.org
- Physical locations and meeting proximity.
- Positi
- Position of the SOs vis-a-vis ICANN
- Practical info - Washington meeting
- Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project
- Proposed DNSO bylaws
- RE: ?Existe esta lista?
- RE: [Fwd: merge5.txt]
- RE: [iana@ISI.EDU: SO note]
- RE: [ifwp] IS it time for a new DNSO?
- RE: [ifwp] Physical locations and meeting proximity.
- RE: [ifwp] RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List
- RE: [ifwp] RE: IS it time for a new DNSO?
- RE: [ifwp] RE: Physical locations and meeting proximity.
- RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List
- RE: AIP DNSO Proposal
- RE: Amendments to dnso.org and dnso.net bylaws
- RE: Commentary on ICC submission
- RE: Comments on draft 7
- RE: DNSO / Fluid Constituencies
- RE: DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1
- RE: DNSO / Individual v. Corporate Voting
- RE: DNSO Dilemma
- RE: DNSO worries
- RE: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time)
- RE: Fw: SO structure - private
- RE: How not to define membership classes
- RE: ICANN Meeting schedule - please announce as in advance as pos
- RE: icc comments in text
- RE: Important Report
- RE: Incorporating DNSO?
- RE: Incorporation or not?
- RE: January DNSO meeting for the trademark interests
- RE: Looks like the Proposal list is bogus[Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]
- RE: Merge draft
- RE: Monterrey, Mexico meeting
- RE: online processes for the dnso
- RE: Our draft
- RE: Practical info - Washington meeting
- RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team
- RE: time
- RE: what ICANN is up to
- Ripple
- rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal
- Scraps
- Secret meetings)
- SO note
- SO note (fwd)
- So.. that's it?
- subscribe
- Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team
- Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team
- Test, please ignore
- Test_discuss
- The DNSO is a special interest group now
- The IANA's File of iTLD Requests (Flashback)
- The Non-Profit Issue Again
- Ticker symbol NSOL
- time
- ulterior messages
- Unannounced, non-public meeting in Washington on , Jan. 21?
- Unannounced, non-public meeting in Washington on Jan. 21?
- Unity is Strength
- UPDATED - DNSO Formation Consultation Meeting - Monterrey
- Users need to be able to speak for
- Users need to be able to speak for themselves(Was:
- Voting mechanisms: the Amer. Arbit. Assoc.
- WASH DC MEET - Unofficial FAQ
- Wash DC Meeting Invitation Letter on the website
- Washington DC Meeting & DNSO Process
- Welcome, and Some pointers
- What is this? Why are we surprised with it?)
- What is this? Why are we surprised with it?
- What's happening
- Who is it that needs trademark protection?
- Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted
- Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the
- Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?
- Your call for input
Last message date: Wed 20 Jan 1999 - 11:22:14 PST
Archived on: Wed Jan 20 1999 - 11:25:06 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.