You wrote:
> I'm only suggesting that, since almost none of the participants are
> posting
> to the participants list, and it isn't being used by the committees to
> post
> information very often, we have no way to know if it's still functioning
> as
> an effective communication channel. All that trouble about it last week,
> and
> Roberto and others, including myself, saying it might be better to close
> it,
> may have convinced the participants not to bother with it anymore.
>
I am still convinced it should be closed, but I solved the problem for my
part.
I leave the pleasure to you guys to get the messages in double.
> There is need for us to know if the participants list is reaching the
> participants, otherwise the dnso committees will have to start posting
> everything to participants' personal e-mail addresses.
>
No, the participants list is *not* reaching *all* the participants. It's no
longer reaching me, for instance.
Please, avoid posting to my personal address. My personal address is for
personal matters. I will receive DNSO matters through the open list
discuss@dnso.org.
I doubt that there can be any reasonment in the world that can convince me
that there is information that has to be addressed to the participants of
Barcelona and/or Monterrey, but hidden to the others.
But you can try. Make an example. ;>)
Regards
Roberto