If the lists' membership were static, it would be one thing - as everyone
on the lists now know about this issue. But the membership is not static,
and as we all realized, new individuals tend to believe what they read -
witness the L.A. Times article incident.
So, if the majority think that it doesn't matter, then that's fine by me. I
guess it makes us all look silly either way.
-- Christopher Ambler"Jeff Williams" said...
> The reason I ask these questions is that the claim that the INTA is supporting >DNSO.ORG is patently false, and we (INEGroup) have 84 members on INTA >that support our position.