>Substitute "choice of country" for "choice of state". The DNSO is an
>international organization, with broad membership from all over the
>world, so the country of incorporation becomes a substantial
>political problem. The IAHC chose to establish CORE in Geneva, and
>got a bunch of flak for that; incorporating in the US was sure to
>raise a loud uproar, as well.
>
Good point. Apart from the uproar then, would anyone have a good suggestion?
Are there any non-US lawyers here able to argue persuasively for
incorporation in any specific jurisdiction outside the US?
--Joop--
http://www.democracy.org.nz/