RE: How not to define membership classes

Roberto Gaetano (Roberto.Gaetano@etsi.fr)
Sun, 3 Jan 1999 23:24:46 +0100


Onno wrote:

> If specific special interests are given special representation, the
> DNSO can not be viewed as a fair organization. A better division into
> membership classes would be in (my opinion):
>
> 1. domain name service provider membership class
> ccTLD registries, existing and prospective gTLD registries,
> registrars
> internet providers
>
> 2. special interest membership class
> special interest organizations (INTA, DNRC, EFF, ...)
>
> 3. general membership class
> other businesses
> individuals
>
I like this approach.
I think it is worth considering for a compromise solution, once we could
come to a good definition of what are the special interest classes.

Roberto