I wasn't instructing you on how to behave -- that is a lost cause; I
was instructing you on the meaning of certain english words:
"thoughtful", "considered", and "productive".
> At the
> age of fifty-five, it's a little unusual to be receiving instruction,
> especially from someone about fifteen years my junior,
Thanks for the compliment :-) I must wear it well. I'm
*considerably* older than you think I am.
[...]
> But I suppose your position as - what? the "editor" of the DNSO.org drafts?
> - puts you in a position to be instructing others in how to read the
> obnoxious proposals of the ICC.
You read it how you like. I was responding to your interpretation
of what I said, which was faulty.
[...]
> ICIIU Proposal for Membership Criteria in the DNSO
>
> DNSO membership is open to any person who is the registrant of a second
> level domain name under the generic TLDs, or of a third level domain name
> under the ccTLDs where second level domains are generic; or any person
> directly delegated to represent such a person.
>
> I think that's a thoughtful and considered comment likely to lead to
> productive debate and a polite and agreeable compromise, too. Don't you?
> Please add it to the DNSO merger draft. Thanks.
Thank you for your input. The current merge draft is already more
inclusive than your definition:
"Any legally defined entity or individual person is eligible to
be a member of the DNSO."
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain