Re: Fwd: [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

Kent Crispin (kent@songbird.com)
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 08:03:34 -0800

I see that this has been forwarded from the "ifwhip" list -- I
answered there, so I will answer here, as well:

On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 08:26:07PM -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
> >
> >In this case, since the DNSO.org is allowing INTA to determine the bylaws,

This is false. INTA provided a well-thought out document giving
their position; DNSO.org will work with them to come up with
something that will hopefully be a reasonable compromise that all
can agree to.

[...]

> >This is exactly what is happening here. One special interest group is
> >going to dictate the "rules"

This is false, as well.

-- 
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair				"Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com				lonesome." -- Mark Twain