You wrote:
> > I think that this discussion is out of place in this list, and that
> > discussion on the DNSO-related meetings are better fit in the open DNSO
> > list, that I put in copy.
>
> You may be right, or you may be wrong. But once you start breaching the
> rules of netiquette and posting another person's messages wherever you
> please, you open the door to every type of Internet abuse. However, even
> though you have not shown me respect here, I will continue to respect you.
>
I apologize.
I didn't think that I was breaking rules, because both lists are open.
But you are right.
> > In fact, I read this message only because it was addressed to me
> directly.
> > With 400+ daily messages I cannot read everything, and I assume that
> most of
> > the people involved in these last steps before Washington feel the same.
> > Therefore, please excuse me if I let this list momentarily in lower
> > priority.
>
> You are free to read or not read whatever you want. You are not free to
> cross-post other people's messages.
>
I said I apologize.
> By the way, why didn't you reply to my questions? Are you against Kilnam's
> suggestion? Don't you think that it might be best to go to Washington on
> Thursday like the invitees, and sleep the night there, maybe get together
> on
> Thursday like they are doing to discuss the meeting on Friday?
>
Definitively better to get there the day before.
Europeans don't have the choice anyhow, because transatlantic flight fly
westbound during the day.
Regards
Roberto