> On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 10:46:08AM -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> > > The for sure right answer is that ORSC should be treated like
> > > everyone else. That probably means that ORSC should not be talking
> > > to DoC.
> >
> > Have you considered asking to speak with the DoC Kent?
>
> No, because it is an obviously untenable position. NTIA doesn't have
> the resources to have a private telecon (with or without
> transcriptions) with anyone who asks.
Kent,
I am suprised that you would make assertions regarding the resources
available to NTIA. If I might ask, how do you know with any certainty
rather NTIA has the necessary resources or not?
> I thought what I was doing would be obvious, but apparently I was too
> subtle. Just so everyone knows exactly where I am coming from -- I
> don't have any problem with Mikki Barry going off and drafting bylaws
> privately, or with there being a private "bwg-n-friends" list, just
> as I think it is perfectly acceptable for there to be a closed
> "participants" list, and just as I think it is perfectly acceptable
> for there to be a private mailing list for people drafting the
> current document. You need a quiet work space, and people need to
> confer. That's fine.
Kent, As Mikki has stated previously *none* of the drafting for the ORSC
proposal occured on the bwg-n-friends list.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF-II? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/