Roberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Einar Stefferud [SMTP:Stef@nma.com]
> Sent: 23 December 1998 08:32
> To: David W. Maher
> Cc: participants@dnso.org; discuss@dnso.org; domain-policy@open-rsc.org
> Subject: Re: Our draft
>
> Fine with me if your bylaws make the Names Council serve as a Fair
> Hearing Panel, buit I see no such bylaws clauses or intentions to sadd
> such to the current drafts.
>
> In short, I have no confidence that your DNSO.ORG or the INTA bylaws
> will produce an organization that will give equality of fair hearing
> to all concerned!
>
> Cheers...\Stef
>
>
> From your message Tue, 22 Dec 1998 22:43:13 -0600:
> }
> }Hi Stef:
> } If the Fair Hearing Panels are merely advisory, what do they do that
> is
> }different from what a properly constructed internationally representative
> }Names Council will be doing anyway?
> } I agree that maximum use should be made of the Internet and email,
> and I'm
> }all in favor of thinking outside the box. It's just that I don't see that
> }one more level of organization does any good in this situation.
> } Merry Christmas
> } David
> }At 10:40 PM 12/21/98 -0800, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> }>Hewllo David -- In my view, Fair Hearing Panels are advisory in
> }>nature, and my notion of letting regions appoint members to Fair
> }>Hearing Panels is intended to serve the need to assure all regions
> }>that they will get a fair hearing before the panel.
> }>
> }