Re: [IDNO:335] List mechanics

Kent Crispin (kent@songbird.com)
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 07:51:28 -0700


On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 11:11:11PM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:

[...]

> 1. It always helps to have a list charter, especially if there is
> pressure to be demonstrably open and non-exclusive in membership. If
> a list member persists in posting messages which are contrary to the
> list charter, then there is every justification in ejecting that user.

By all means a charter should be developed, and it should be posted
on the web. It's not good for someone to make up rules about who
they want to throw out on the fly, that's for sure. Especially if
they want to be taken seriously as a DNSO constituency...

> I mention this, fully realising that debating a list charter may not
> be a trivial task :) Perhaps something simple to start with, along the
> lines that personal attacks and extended off-topic postings are not
> appropriate -- the charter can always be modified as the list matures.

You do need to define what is on-topic, then.

[...]

> 3. List archive.
>
> The idno and idno-announce lists started their lives un-archived, but
> I started archiving around [IDNO:89]. These archives are not currently
> published on the web, but it is trivial for me to do so should this be
> desirable. See http://www.patho.gen.nz/list/ape-discuss/ to see what
> kind of thing is available.

Those archives should be published on the web. Otherwise IDNO is
just a private club.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain