Re: [IDNO:402] wire update

Dean Robb (pceasy@NORFOLK.INFI.NET)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:53:19 -0400

At 05:36 PM 6/17/99 -0400, Chuck Gomes wrote:
>Let's look at the facts. Under Amendment 11 NSI was
>supposed to be given the names of the testbed registrars in
>December. We asked for them with plenty of lead time
>realizing that there would be contractual issues to work
>out. We received the names 2 days before the begin of the
>test bed period. Help me understand what we did wrong
>there.

Hmmmm. Interesting. Another conflict between NSI and ICANN. The
prevailing, multiply-sourced story is that NSI didn't provide the
information/materials needed by ICANN to name the registrars until quite
late in the game.

Now, I don't know that that is the absolute truth...but that's what I've
been told by several people from different organizations who were a party
to the entire matter.

As for what you did wrong, Chuck, I don't see anything...IF the tale is as
you say. Frankly, I have trouble buying much of your pravda...I'm still
waiting to know what amendment allows you to ignore your contractual
requirements to post performance data.

"Let there be light!"...and God invented Thomas Edison.

Dean Robb
Owner, PC-EASY
(757) 495-EASY [3279]
On-site computer repair, upgrades and consultations
Lead SimOps columnist/reviewer on http://WWW.TheGamers.Net